Summary of Causam Enterprises, Inc. v. International Trade Commission (Fed. Cir. Oct. 15, 2025)

  • Post author:
  • Post category:Patents

Wow, the Federal Circuit seriously narrowed the scope of some patent assignments. Continuation-in-Part Applications Not Covered in Assignments The Federal Circuit held that a 2007 patent assignment did not cover…

Continue ReadingSummary of Causam Enterprises, Inc. v. International Trade Commission (Fed. Cir. Oct. 15, 2025)

How One Supreme Court Decision Sparked an Era of “Efficient Infringement” — and What Might Be Changing

  • Post author:
  • Post category:Patents

Nearly two decades ago, the Supreme Court’s decision in eBay v. MercExchange quietly reshaped the patent landscape — and not necessarily for the better.  The ruling rejected the idea that winning a patent…

Continue ReadingHow One Supreme Court Decision Sparked an Era of “Efficient Infringement” — and What Might Be Changing

Enablement and Prior Art: What Agilent v. Synthego Teaches Us About the Limits of Patent Protection

Enablement Depends on Context In patent law, “enablement” is critical. However, the required detail varies depending on your goal—getting a patent or invalidating one.This distinction became clear in Agilent Technologies…

Continue ReadingEnablement and Prior Art: What Agilent v. Synthego Teaches Us About the Limits of Patent Protection

USPTO AI subject matter eligibility guidance

Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/07/17/2024-15377/2024-guidance-update-on-patent-subject-matter-eligibility-including-on-artificial-intelligenceThe US Patent Office continues to issue guidance on subject matter eligibility  under 35 U.S.C. § 101.  This latest July guidance addresses AI-assisted inventions, and adds very little to…

Continue ReadingUSPTO AI subject matter eligibility guidance